Roll-out and effectiveness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in France: An overview.

CONTEXT: Oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been available and fully reimbursed for people at high risk of sexually acquired HIV infection in France since January 2016. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the roll-out of PrEP use in France and its real-life effectiveness. The main results of two previously published studies were presented at the second e-congress of the EPI-PHARE scientific interest group on pharmacoepidemiology and public decision support held in June 2022, and are reported in this article. METHODS: Two studies were carried out using the French National Health Data System (SNDS) covering 99% of the French population. A first study aimed to evaluate the roll-out of PrEP use in France from its implementation until June 2021, globally over the entire study period, including an assessment of the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that started in February 2020 in France. A second study using a nested case-control design was conducted in a cohort of men at high risk of HIV acquisition included between January 2016 and June 2020 to assess the effectiveness of PrEP in the real world. RESULTS: As of 30 June 2021, a total of 42 159 people had initiated PrEP in France. Initiations increased steadily until February 2020, then slowed down sharply from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and resumed from the first half of 2021. PrEP users were overwhelmingly men (98%), with an average age of 36 years, living in a large urban area (74%), and of whom a minority (7%) were socioeconomically disadvantaged. Throughout the study period, the level of PrEP maintenance from one semester to the next was high (80-90%). However, for 20% of PrEP initiators, no prescription renewals were recorded during the first six months, suggesting a substantial proportion of early treatment discontinuation. A minority (21%) of PrEP renewal prescriptions were made by private practitioners. Among 46 706 men at high risk of HIV infection, 256 patients identified with HIV infection were matched with 1213 controls. PrEP was used by 29% of cases and 49% of controls. Overall, PrEP effectiveness reached 60% (95% confidence interval 46% to 71%), and was increased in people with high PrEP use (93% (84% to 97%)), or after excluding periods of treatment discontinuation (86% (79% to 92%)). PrEP effectiveness was significantly reduced in people under 30 years of age (26% (-21% to 54%)) and in socioeconomically disadvantaged people (-64% (-392% to 45%)), for whom low PrEP uptake rates or high PrEP discontinuation rates were frequently observed. CONCLUSION: PrEP roll-out has been strongly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in France. Although it has been substantial among men who have sex with men, additional measures are needed to expand access to PrEP to all other population groups that could benefit from it. Promoting adherence to PrEP (especially among young people and the socioeconomically disadvantaged) will be essential to ensure a higher level of PrEP effectiveness, which has been shown to be lower in real-life settings than in clinical trials.

Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on contraception use in France.

To limit the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19), sanitary restrictions have been established since March 2020 in France. These restrictions and the waves of contamination may have had consequences on the use of health products in general, and on the use of contraceptives in particular. We aimed to assess the impact of COVID 19 pandemic from March 16th 2020 to April 30th 2021 in France on reimbursed contraceptives. We analyzed data from the French national health insurance database (SNDS) by extracting all oral contraception (OC), emergency contraception (EC), levonorgestrel-intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), copper-intrauterine device (C-IUD) and contraceptive implant dispensations in 2018, 2019, 2020 and to April 30th 2021. We computed the expected use of contraceptives in 2020 and 2021 without pandemic and its associated sanitary restrictions, by taking the annual trend into account. We assessed the evolution of dispensations by type of contraceptive and by age-groups (≤25 years old, between 25 and 35 and >35 years old) between observed and expected dispensations. After 15 months of pandemic, a decrease of all reimbursed contraceptives dispensations had been estimated, compared with what was expected: -2.0% for OC, -5.0% for EC, -9.5% for LNG-IUS, -8.6% for C-IUD, -16.4% for implant. Women under 25 years old were the most impacted by the decrease. This national study showed that the impact of the COVID 19 crisis was global on all reimbursed contraceptives, with different levels of impact depending on the type of contraceptive, the age-group and the severity of the restriction. OC dispensing decreased marginally compared with expectations. The decrease in long-acting contraceptives dispensing was more pronounced, especially for the implant. These results call for continued monitoring of contraceptive use over the long term and for prioritizing access to sexual health services during crises, especially among the youngest women who were most affected in this study.

Does Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) Vaccination Protect against COVID-19 Outcomes: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Cross-protection from previous live attenuated vaccines is proposed to explain the low impact of COVID-19 on children. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of live attenuated MMR vaccines on the risk of being hospitalized for COVID-19 in children. An exposed (MMR vaccine)-non-exposed cohort study was conducted using the nationwide French National Health Data System (SNDS). We included children born between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019. Exposure was defined as a claim of at least one dose of MMR vaccine since birth. Hospitalization for COVID-19 was defined using main diagnostic ICD10 codes. Non-conditional logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of the association between MMR exposure and hospitalization for COVID-19, controlling for socio-demographic and socio-economic factors, co-morbidities, and general health. In total, 6,800,542 (median age 6 IQR [3-8] years) children exposed to a MMR vaccine and 384,162 (6 [3-9] years) not exposed were followed up with for 18 months. Among them, 873 exposed to the MMR vaccine and 38 who were not exposed were hospitalized for COVID-19. In a multi-variate analysis, the exposure of children to MMR vaccination was not associated with a decreased risk of COVID-19 hospitalization versus non-exposure (aOR (95%CI) = 1.09 [0.81-1.48]). A stratified analysis by age showed an aOR = 1.03 [0.64-1.66] for children aged 1-4, an aOR = 1.38 [0.82-2.31] for those aged 5-9, and an aOR = 1.11 [0.54-2.29] for those aged 10-12. Our study suggests that the live attenuated MMR vaccine does not protect children against COVID-19 hospitalization.

Roll-out of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use in France: A nationwide observational study from 2016 to 2021.

Background: Oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been available and fully reimbursed for people at high risk of sexually acquired HIV infection in France since January 2016. Its dissemination has been widely promoted to reduce HIV incidence in high-risk populations. This study aimed to assess the roll-out of PrEP use in France from its implementation until mid-2021. Methods: Using the French National Health Data System (SNDS) covering 99% of people residing in France, all PrEP users defined as individuals aged 15 years or older who received at least one dispensing of PrEP between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2021 were identified. PrEP users number and their socio-demographic and PrEP use characteristics were assessed over time. Findings: As of 30 June 2021, a total of 42 159 individuals had initiated PrEP in France. Monthly PrEP initiations increased steadily up to 1027 in February 2020, and then slowed down sharply from the onset of the COVID-19 epidemic until a recovery in the first half of 2021. PrEP users were overwhelmingly men (97·5%, 41 126/42 159), aged 36 years on average, living in a large metropolitan area (73·8%, 31 096/42 159), and among whom a minority (7·0%, 2966/42 159) were socio-economically disadvantaged. Throughout the study period, 80-90% of users renewed PrEP from one semester to another, suggesting a good level of maintenance among those engaged in treatment. Nevertheless, for 20·1% (7148/35 549) of new PrEP users no prescription renewal was recorded in the first six months after initiation, suggesting a substantial proportion of early treatment discontinuation. Private practitioners accounted for a minority (21·3%, 77 885/366 399) of PrEP renewal prescriptions. Interpretation: PrEP roll-out has been markedly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in France. Although PrEP deployment has been substantial among men who have sex with men, further action is needed to expand access to PrEP to all other population groups who could benefit from it and to promote adherence to treatment. Funding: This research was carried out within EPI-PHARE without external funding.

Real-world effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis in men at high risk of HIV infection in France: a nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has shown high efficacy in clinical trials, but few observational studies have confirmed its effectiveness when prescribed in real life to users with diverse profiles. This study aimed to assess real-world PrEP effectiveness. METHODS: We did a matched, nested case-control study among adult men at high risk of HIV infection between Jan 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020, using data from the French national health data system. Men who were newly diagnosed with HIV infection up to Dec 31, 2020, were individually matched with up to five controls for age, socioeconomic status, place of residence, calendar year, and follow-up duration. PrEP use was characterised on the basis of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine dispensing over time. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of PrEP use associated with HIV infection. PrEP effectiveness (computed as 1-adjusted OR), was estimated overall, by mode of PrEP use, and by individuals' sociodemographic characteristics. FINDINGS: Among a total of 46 706 individuals, 256 patients with HIV infection were identified and matched with 1213 controls. PrEP users accounted for 29% of cases and 49% of controls. PrEP effectiveness was 60% (95% CI 46 to 71) overall, reaching 93% (84 to 97) for a high amount of PrEP consumption, and 86% (78 to 92) if excluding periods after PrEP discontinuation. PrEP effectiveness was significantly reduced in people younger than 30 years (26% [-21 to 54]) and in those who were socioeconomically deprived (-64% [-392 to 45]), both of which groups showed low amounts of PrEP consumption and high rates of PrEP discontinuation. INTERPRETATION: PrEP effectiveness appears to be lower in real-world conditions than is reported in clinical trials. Strengthening efforts to improve the monitoring of PrEP compliance will be essential to ensure PrEP effectiveness, especially among young and socioeconomically deprived recipients. FUNDING: None.

Impact of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on contraception use in 2020 and up until the end of April 2021 in France.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of reimbursed contraceptives in France after 15 months of the pandemic, according to age-group and updating previous data only pertaining to the first lockdown (2 months). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a national register-based study by extracting all reimbursements of oral contraceptives (OC), emergency contraception (EC), intrauterine devices (IUD), and implants from the French National Health Insurance database (SNDS), which includes and covers 99.5% of the French population, in 2018, 2019, 2020 and from January 1, 2021 to April30, 2021. We calculated the expected use of contraceptives in 2020 and 2021 in the absence of the pandemic, based on 2018 and 2019 usage and taking annual trends into account. We assessed the difference between observed and expected dispensing rates by contraceptive type and by age-group (≤18 years old, 18< age ≤25, 25< age ≤35, >35). RESULTS: Dispensing of all contraceptives decreased compared to expect dispensing numbers: -2.0% for OC, -5.3% for EC, -9.5% for LNG-IUS, -8.6% for C-IUD, and -16.4% for implant. This decrease in the dispensing of contraceptives was observed in all age-groups, but mainly concerned women under the age of 18 years (-22% for OC, -10% for EC, -37.2% for LNG-IUS, -36.4% for C-IUD, -26.4% for implant) and those aged 18 to 25 (-5.1% for OC, -11.9% for EC, -18.1% for LNG-IUS, -15.9% for C-IUD, -17.6% for implants). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the dispensing of contraceptives in France was markedly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Prescriptions for long-acting contraceptive use and women under the age of 25 years were the most substantially impacted. Ensuring access to contraceptive methods during health emergencies must be a public health policy priority. IMPLICATIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic strongly impacted the dispensing of contraceptives in France with varying degrees of decreased dispensing according to the type of contraceptive, the age-group and the level of pandemic-related restrictions. The impact of these restrictions on unintended pregnancy at the population level remains undetermined.